Trends in online advertising
December 7, 2008 at 12:49 pm | In Trends-Predictions, search | 1 CommentAdvertising has come a long way since its inception. A simple concept of endorsing links to online resources has becoming a dominating factor on the web. But given the state of online advertising now, what is the roadmap and what can we expect in the future.
The answer is of course non trivial and I will only make a fool of myself by trying to predict the answer, but there are certain inferences I have made based on my observation which I shall pen down. I divide the broad category of pc users into prospects and adless users. Prospects are users who are new or ignorant to concept of online advertising, people like my mother who doesn’t know people endorse links for money. This category could also include people who are open to targeted advertising and see a value add with it. These are people who wholeheartedly click on interesting links. The other category I call adless users, users who have been around the internet long enough to understand irrelevant ads and can spot and ignore ads in a page.
More time a user spends online, the probability of him/her realizing the web is filled with irrelevant ads and over time becoming adless users. As a result, almost all users tend to move towards becoming adless users. This is dangerous for marketers, ad companies, publishers etc as there is a whole eco system depending solely depending on money made out of ads. As new users discover the web, their prospect phase is what publishers can hope to cash in on, but eventually the shift will happen. What happens then ?
Search engines are arguably the best places for advertising and probably the best place for demonstrating the phenomenon I call intrusive or endorsed content. Take the example below.

Ads will stop being sidekicks and move into the foreground, I have shown the shift pictorically. Payperpost got the next concept right, people wont read ads, but social media yes, so pay people to write about your product/service etc. More results on search engines will be endoresed and most of them already are, how do you know a review you are reading of some product isnt already endorsed. Now here is the strangeloop bit, you could say you will search for bad reviews instead of good like this. It wont take long for the advertisers to see this trend as well and then pay for people to write moderately bad reviews inturn endorsing the product. You know that they know that you are looking for bad reviews !!
A surprising result on top caught my eye. A visit to the site will tell you immediately that the site isn’t half as good as the second or the third result, but still its on top. SEO has come a long way and to cheat search engines into making a page popular isn’t that hard. You can hire professionals to do that job. That in a wierd sense is a form of endorsing, a professional SEO group can start bidding for making pages more popular and start their own cartel for endorsed content.
The other strange phenomenon I see that people recognize big search brands, Google in particular, but don’t necessarily relate to the results( you can’t possible relate to the results). You could have the Google homepage serving ads from ask.com and nobody would know the difference if the results looked like Google returned them. Thats probably the reason there still are companies trying to capitalize on the search market. Take a look at the results page below.

In this case the difference between a result from the index and an endorsement is a mere patch of color. How difficult do you think it is to remove that demarcation during difficult times. Ethical boundries as meagre as color differences can be crossed very easily and corporations have showed time and again it can be done.
Thanks to the falling prices of bandwidth and also social media, video is the next big delivery mechanism and it was quite understandable that Google paid a billion and a half to capitalize on youtube’s huge market share and put intrusive ads on videos( you dont have a choice there, no adblock plus !! ). Same goes with pictures and audio. Radio, papers and the television have been doing it for years.
The world thought that we moved away from pop up advertising but we have just made the situation far worse. Ads will become more and more intrusive and there could come a time when content and advertisement are indistinguishable. More on this later.
Human in the loop searches
October 24, 2008 at 8:20 pm | In search | Leave a CommentFor quite some time now, I am using social media sites to do my searching. Its not that traditional search results are bad, just that for most of the results that I am trying to get to, social media sites are doing a far better job. Take for example a search on accessibility or cognitive psychology. It’s painful to get through the clutter and get to results that actually pertain to sites that describe accessibility and information on it. But a couple of searches on Digg and Delicious and I have tons of results at my disposal. Traditional web searches work well for certain types of queries, like word lookups, product lookups, news etc. Non trivial query results have a tough time gaining page rank and will usually fail to show up on the results screen. The central point here is that, for certain searches, you just need the wisdom of the crowds.
I know when I look at sites like Digg, Reddit and Delicious people have gone through these links and painfully tagged and saved these links. Which means that with a very high probability its not marketing gibberish or spam. Folksonomy should definitely be given the credit for making life more organized. While searching for certain tags(delicious), I also discover other related tags and then run more filtered searches to improve the relevance of the results. The web, at least for the moment, is said to be partial to content on computers (technology in general, iPhone in particular J ) and for the zillion other domains that the web doesn’t do justice to, traditional ranking methods do little to improve relevance. Human in the loop is definitely better for such queries.
One of the projects that I have worked on is targeting this very need for non trivial searches. Silverfish, is a semantics extraction engine for academic documents and courses. The indexed results and the social aspect of the site are used to update researchers on the latest in their fields of interest and also recommend fresh material. When more and more people start using the internet there will be an increased demand for searches not related to technology and in such cases human in the loop searches will definitely take front stage. Future of search is definitely going to be more interesting.
Glue Search
May 8, 2008 at 10:58 am | In Web 2.0, search | Leave a CommentYahoo India search has a new feature which is very impressive, the glue search page. Its a portal search page which displays results like a portal on the topic. I didnt see a world wide release though, but on the India page its there. Portal serach is a concept which people have been trying to work on for a long time. Ofcourse portals can only be given for relevent search results which have information sources of different types. Try it at
try these example searches
http://in.search.yahoo.com/search?p=Mysore&fr=sfp&ei=UTF-8&rd=r1
http://in.search.yahoo.com/search?p=IPL&fr=sfp&ei=UTF-8&rd=r1
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

